State v. Milbradt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was error for the trial court to admit a psychotherapist’s testimony that, among other things, complainant did not display “indicators of deception”
• concluding that time is not a material element of sexual abuse or rape
• holding that time is not a material element of rape or sexual abuse
• holding that time is not a material element of rape or sexual abuse
• concluding that time is not a material element of sexual abuse or rape
• holding that time is not a material element of rape or sexual abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).