Skip to main content

State v. Pitt

Citations

  • 147 P.3d 940
  • 209 Or. App. 270
  • 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding video taped testimony of two children was inadmissible as testimonial
  • statements made to private forensic child interviewer while police officer videotaped interview through one-way glass were testimonial
  • videotaped interviews of child victims at a child abuse assessment center were critical to the State's case and inadmissible
  • statements made to private forensic child interviewer while police officer videotaped interview through one-way glass were testimonial
  • reversible error to admit \testimonial\ videotaped statements made by two children to social worker at child-abuse assessment center when children did not testify at trial
  • reversible error to admit “testimonial” videotaped statements made by two children to social worker at child-abuse assessment center when children did not testify at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Brewer, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.