Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/15/2006
State v. Pitt
Citations
- 147 P.3d 940
- 209 Or. App. 270
- 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1785
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding video taped testimony of two children was inadmissible as testimonial
- statements made to private forensic child interviewer while police officer videotaped interview through one-way glass were testimonial
- videotaped interviews of child victims at a child abuse assessment center were critical to the State's case and inadmissible
- statements made to private forensic child interviewer while police officer videotaped interview through one-way glass were testimonial
- reversible error to admit \testimonial\ videotaped statements made by two children to social worker at child-abuse assessment center when children did not testify at trial
- reversible error to admit “testimonial” videotaped statements made by two children to social worker at child-abuse assessment center when children did not testify at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-09-14· cited 82×
- State v. PittOregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-18· cited 80×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-22· cited 55×
- Rangel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-13· cited 53×
- State v. BentleySupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-09-28· cited 43×
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-20· cited 18×
- State v. BurrNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-05-08· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. AllshouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-18· cited 15×
- State v. NorbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 13×
- State v. BudaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-12-20· cited 12×
- State v. ForemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-04-11· cited 6×
- State v. AlneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-07· cited 3×
- State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 2×
- State v. PittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-15· cited 1×
- State v. Mendoza-LazaroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-03-14· cited 1×
- State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. SPCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-20
- State v. HAGGBLOMCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-05-27
- Rangel, RodolfoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-13
- Coronado, TommyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-09-14
- State Of Iowa Vs. James Howard BentleySupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-09-28
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-20· cited 149×
- State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court· 1993-01-22· cited 83×
- State v. MacKOregon Supreme Court· 2004-11-26· cited 55×
- State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 53×
- State v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 19×
- State v. StalderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-04-19· cited 12×
- State v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-16· cited 11×
- State v. PoitraCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-31· cited 7×
- State v. StalderOregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.