Arizona Supreme Court· 5/7/1996
State v. Jones
Citations
- 917 P.2d 200
- 185 Ariz. 471
- 216 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 36
- 1996 Ariz. LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that despite warrant-less search of a car, police inevitably would have found contents during subsequent inventory search
- holding that despite warrantless search of a car, police inevitably would have found contents during subsequent inventory search
- stating that cruelty focuses on the mental anguish or physical abuse inflicted by the defendant on the victim before her death
- stating that reversal for violation of Criminal Procedure Rule 9.3(a) is warranted only when the non-violating party “suffered prejudice”
- stating that reversal for violation of Criminal Procedure Rule 9.3(a) is warranted only when the non-violating party “suffered prejudice”
- stating that “[i]f a witness violates rule 9.3(a), the trial court has discretion when deciding whether to admit that witness’s testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corcoran, Feldman, Zlaket, Moeller, Martone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-11-26· cited 235×
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-05-04· cited 191×
- State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 180×
- State v. RienhardtArizona Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 164×
- State v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court· 1998-10-20· cited 158×
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2015-12-29· cited 154×
- State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 122×
- State v. DoerrArizona Supreme Court· 1998-11-12· cited 114×
- State v. BocharskiArizona Supreme Court· 2008-08-08· cited 107×
- State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court· 2007-06-13· cited 103×
- State of Arizona v. Shawna FordeArizona Supreme Court· 2014-01-17· cited 103×
- State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court· 2003-05-05· cited 101×
- State v. MedinaArizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-04· cited 98×
- State v. CanezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 94×
- State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-26· cited 92×
- State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn HausnerArizona Supreme Court· 2012-07-10· cited 89×
- State v. DjerfArizona Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 82×
- State v. CañezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 80×
- State v. KayerArizona Supreme Court· 1999-06-29· cited 75×
- State v. HallArizona Supreme Court· 2003-03-25· cited 69×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 217×
- State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court· 1989-04-11· cited 211×
- State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 206×
- State v. GulbrandsonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 189×
- State v. WaltonArizona Supreme Court· 1989-02-02· cited 167×
- State v. McCallArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-09· cited 164×
- State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-15· cited 158×
- State v. CorrellArizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-28· cited 157×
- State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court· 1992-01-28· cited 142×
- State v. GreenwayArizona Supreme Court· 1991-12-03· cited 139×
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court· 1994-11-03· cited 136×
- State v. StuardArizona Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 121×
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court· 1993-09-30· cited 113×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.