Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 917 P.2d 200
  • 185 Ariz. 471
  • 216 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 36
  • 1996 Ariz. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that despite warrant-less search of a car, police inevitably would have found contents during subsequent inventory search
  • holding that despite warrantless search of a car, police inevitably would have found contents during subsequent inventory search
  • stating that cruelty focuses on the mental anguish or physical abuse inflicted by the defendant on the victim before her death
  • stating that reversal for violation of Criminal Procedure Rule 9.3(a) is warranted only when the non-violating party “suffered prejudice”
  • stating that reversal for violation of Criminal Procedure Rule 9.3(a) is warranted only when the non-violating party “suffered prejudice”
  • stating that “[i]f a witness violates rule 9.3(a), the trial court has discretion when deciding whether to admit that witness’s testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corcoran, Feldman, Zlaket, Moeller, Martone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.