Arizona Supreme Court· 3/25/2003

State v. Hall

Citations

65 P.3d 90
204 Ariz. 442
396 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
2003 Ariz. LEXIS 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that although the victim’s body was never recovered, sufficient circumstantial evidence was admitted to establish the corpus delicti in a first-degree murder case
stating that a defendant bears the burden of establishing that jurors “received and considered extrinsic evidence”
discussing the corpus delicti rule and holding that the State had established the corpus delicti in a first-degree murder case
explaining evidence supporting an inference of the corpus delicti can be circumstantial in a case involving evidence of a confession or admission
only when suspect invokes right to counsel is state precluded from reinitiating questioning without an attorney
“[P]hysical evidence is not required to sustain a conviction if the totality of the circumstances demonstrates guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berch, Jones, McGregor, Feldman, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.