Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/2/2003

State v. Powers

Citations

654 N.W.2d 667
2003 Minn. LEXIS 1
2003 WL 25872289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the defendant’s absence from the motion hearing was not prejudicial because the defendant’s presence would not have changed the outcome of the motion hearing
holding that a statement did not amount to misconduct because \[t]he improper statement was only two sentences in a closing argument that amounted to over 20 transcribed pages\
stating that issues not addressed in an appellate brief are considered waived and will not be reviewed
explaining that we consider the closing argument as a whole and review prosecutorial misconduct “in light of the whole trial”
directing that closing arguments should be considered as a whole
“Issues not addressed by a party's brief are considered waived . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilbert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.