Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 735 N.W.2d 674
  • 2007 Minn. LEXIS 392
  • 2007 WL 2051107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plain error is error that violated a law, rule, or standard of conduct
  • stating that the comments were not pervasive as they covered less than one of 64 pages of transcript
  • reasoning that misconduct did not affect substantial rights because of an acquittal of one charge
  • stating that misconduct was not pervasive when it covered less than one page of a 64-page argument
  • noting that the prosecutor’s improper suggestions were not pervasive because they covered “less than one of the 64 pages of the transcript containing [the witness’s] testimony”
  • stating that “whether the defendant had an opportunity to . . . rebut the improper suggestions” is one factor courts can use in examining prejudicial effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.