Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/11/2004

Ex Parte Briseno

Citations

135 S.W.3d 1
2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 199
2004 WL 244826

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Atkins does not require a jury determination of mental retardation in a post-conviction proceeding
holding that Atkins does not require a jury determination of mental retardation in a post-conviction proceeding
holding that Atkins does not require a jury determination of mental retardation in a post-conviction proceeding
holding that Atkins does not require a jury determination of mental retardation in a post-conviction proceeding
deciding that this Court had to act “during this legislative interregnum” to provide guidelines to the bench and bar
arguing that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not developing evidence that Butler was incompetent to stand trial due to mental illness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

207 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.