Skip to main content

State v. Pribble

Citations

  • 285 S.W.3d 310
  • 2009 Mo. LEXIS 133
  • 2009 WL 1456343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a five-year mandatory minimum parole ineligibility period does not “run[ ] afoul of cruel and unusual punishment”
  • “[Rjeviewing courts are to determine, as a threshold matter, whether a sentence is ‘grossly disproportionate.’ ”
  • finding no merit in claim that mandatory minimum of five years before parole eligibility on the crime of enticement of a child constituted cruel and unusual punishment
  • statute is not void for vagueness if person of ordinary intelligence has definite warning as to proscribed conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary R. Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.