Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 228 Conn. 59
  • 634 A.2d 293
  • 1993 Conn. LEXIS 402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • both cases declining review under Golding and finding proper instruction describing reasonable doubt as “a doubt for which a valid reason may be assigned”
  • “[although a clarifying amendment of the rules of practice to address the problem illuminated by this case might well be desirable, this court does not sit as the [r]ules [c]ommittee of the Superior Court”
  • “[although a clarifying amendment [to] the rules of practice to address the problem illuminated . . . might well be desirable, this court does not sit as the [r]ules [c]ommittee of the Superior Court”
  • ‘‘[a]lthough a clarifying amendment [to] the rules of practice to address the problem illuminated by this case might well be desirable, this court does not sit as the Rules Com- mittee’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.