Glasser v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury verdict must be sustained “if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it”
• holding that the issue of a conflict of interest is a highly fact-specific one
• noting that a criminal verdict “must be sustained if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the government, to support it”
• stating that testimony that bank was federally insured would be sufficient to establish jurisdiction under§ 1344
• finding that the inability of counsel to effectively cross-examine a witness amounted to a conflict of interest
• stating that “[t]he verdict of a jury must be sustained if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).