Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/26/1993

State v. Reddick

Citations

224 Conn. 445
619 A.2d 453
1993 Conn. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reviewing trial court’s denial of defendant’s request to exclude himself from suppression hearing under abuse of discretion standard
“[t]he dissent does not own the comer on the recognition of ‘the problems of cross-racial identification’ ”
reversal warranted “where an abuse of discretion is manifest or where injustice appears to have been done”
reversal warranted ‘where an abuse of discretion is manifest or where injustice appears to have been done’
reversal warranted where an abuse of discretion is manifest or where injustice appears to have been done
‘‘we are not bound by ill advised concessions of any party’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, Borden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.