United States v. Charles Lidge Bolts and Joe Dee Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \testimony showed substantial amounts of money passing through the hands of the parties to the transactions\
• the Fifth Circuit limited its Gipson holding to cases in which the judge specifically and expressly permitted a nonunanimous verdict in its jury instructions
• no requirement that five subordinates must act in concert at the same time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).