Skip to main content

State v. Ortiz

Citations

  • 217 Conn. 648
  • 588 A.2d 127
  • 1991 Conn. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on New York cases for interpretation of General Statutes § 53a-54a [a]
  • reversal of conviction based on unconstitutionally improper jury instruction appropriate only when it is reasonably possible that jury was misled by instruction
  • court provided instruction when defendant dragged victim’s body into alley and drove away in vehi- cle
  • court provided instruction when defendant dragged victim’s body into alley and drove away in vehi- cle
  • challenge to jury instruction requires review to determine whether it is reasonably possible that jury was misled
  • “the [extreme emotional disturbance] statute plainly requires [the jury’s] determination to be made from the viewpoint of a person in the defendant’s situation under the circumstances as the defendant believed them to be” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.