Skip to main content

State v. James

Citations

  • 211 Conn. 555
  • 560 A.2d 426
  • 1989 Conn. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, although .state statute declares competence of child sexual assault victims, “courts have authority to exclude evidence that may be more prejudicial than probative”
  • recognizing legislature’s shared authority with judiciary to enact rules of evidence, but noting court’s prior exercise of its authority to declare such legislative rules violative of constitutional principles, such as due pro cess and equal protection
  • noting that “competency is closely related to credibility”
  • pre-1995 risk of injury to child statute not same offense as either sexual assault in second degree or sexual assault in fourth degree
  • \[i]n 1848 the common law disability of parties to testify as witnesses was removed by a statute now incorporated in General Statutes § 52-145 [a]\
  • ‘‘[i]n 1848 the common law disability of parties to testify as witnesses was removed by a statute now incorporated in General Statutes § 52-145 [a]’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.