State v. Ouellette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ‘‘[i]n trials to the court, where admissible evidence encompasses an improper as well as a proper purpose, it is presumed that the court used [the evidence] only for an admissible pur- pose’’
• \the [constancy of accusation] exception applies only to testimony of witnesses to whom the victim complains concerning the act charged \ [emphasis added]
• “the [constancy of accusation] exception applies only to testimony of witnesses to whom the victim complains concerning the act charged” [emphasis added]
• “the [constancy of accusation] exception applies only to testimony of witnesses to whom the victim complains concerning the act charged” [emphasis added]
• “[i]t is a general rule that a case resolves only those issues explicitly decided in the case”
• defendant requested limiting instruction, and trial court indicated that it would give jury instruction but failed to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).