Handler v. Remington Arms Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying continuing course of conduct doctrine to toll statute of limitations on basis of continuing duty to warn of defective cartridge by manufacturer
• arms manufacturer had continuing duty to warn purchaser of defect after manufacture and sale of weapon
• arms manufacturer had continuing duty to warn purchaser of defect after manufacture and sale of weapon
• statute of limitations tolled by defendant manufacturer’s continuing failure to warn of potential danger associated with inherently dangerous cartridge of ammunition
• statute of limitations tolled by defendant manufacturer’s continuing failure to warn of potential danger associated with inherently dangerous cartridge of ammunition
• failure to warn “was a claim of conduct continuing to the time of injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).