Oregon Supreme Court· 10/14/2004

State v. Cox

Citations

98 P.3d 1103
337 Or. 477
2004 Ore. LEXIS 704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that Court had not decided whether such a Fifth Amendment pleading requirement would apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment
explaining that OEC 404(3) did not prevent the defendant from introducing evidence of the victim’s past violent acts to prove that the defendant feared the victim
declining to reach a Confrontation Clause claim brought under Crawford because defendant did not raise a timely objection to the testimony
assuming, but not deciding, that admitting hearsay statements was error, but declining to exercise discretion to reach the issue
declining to exercise plain error review of an unpreserved Crawford objection
declining to exercise plain error review of an unpreserved Crawford objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leggert, Kistler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.