State v. Curtis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s arguments and questions on cross-examination did not demonstrate a strategic reason not to object
• exercising discretion in part because the officer’s testimony that the FSTs were standardized national tests and that two clues would indi- cate impairment was a grave error where the evidence of impaired driving was “weak”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ortiz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-27· cited 7×
• State v. Curtis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-06
• State v. Vaninetti
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-31

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. Fults
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 218×
• State v. Horton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-26· cited 98×
• State v. Ortiz
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2024-08-08· cited 58×
• State v. Inman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 42×