Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/26/2023

State v. Horton

Citations

327 Or. App. 256
535 P.3d 338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that a criminal conviction cannot be reversed based on harmless error, i.e., when there is little likelihood that the error affected the verdict
concluding that, if a plain error was harmless, “then we have no discretion and must affirm”
recognizing that harm- less error is not a basis for reversal, whether preserved or plain
holding that it was plain error not to give any mental- state instruction at all for a particular element, but that it Cite as 346 Or App 402 (2026
recognizing that harmless error is not a basis for reversal, whether preserved or plain
noting that if a plain error is harmless, we have no discretion to correct it and must affirm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aoyagi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Horton

159 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.