Oregon Supreme Court· 12/13/2007

State v. Ramirez

Citations

173 P.3d 817
343 Or. 505
2007 Ore. LEXIS 1202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

bolding that there is “no legitimate debate” that a jury would have found the departure factor where evidence in support of that factor is “overwhelming”
applying Ailes factors in determining whether this court erred in exercising its discretion to correct plain error
setting out “legitimate debate” standard for exercise of discretion to review unpreserved challenges to departure sentences based on judicial findings of fact
setting out “legitimate debate” standard for exercise of discretion to review unpreserved challenges to departure sentences based on judicial findings of fact
setting out “legitimate debate” standard for exercise of discretion to review unpreserved challenges to departure sentences based on judicial findings of fact
setting out “legitimate debate” standard for exercise of discretion to review unpreserved challenges to departure sentences based on judicial findings of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.