State v. Giang Nguyen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Miranda warnings and waiver did not expire over the course of five to eight hours when adult suspect was transported to jail by a different officer to a different location, even though suspect spoke limited English and did not have an interpreter on the drive
• when the underlying facts are undisputed, this court’s review of whether a Confrontation Clause issue arose is de novo
• \[A] waiver does not expire through the mere passage of 5 to 8 hours when a suspect has been in continuous custody.\
• \[A] waiver does not expire through the mere passage of 5 to 8 hours when a suspect has been in continuous custody.\
• \Violation of the Confrontation Clause is subject to analysis under the federal harmless error rule.\
• generally, a decision overruling precedent is applied to all similar cases pending as of the date of the overruling decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).