District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/26/2007
Hernandez v. State
Citations
- 946 So. 2d 1270
- 2007 WL 188417
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the nurse’s questions were the functional equivalent of police interrogation
- holding statute permits use of trustworthy confession when State unable to locate victim
- statute permits use of trustworthy confession when state unable to locate victim
- \To 'corroborate' means '[t]o strengthen or support with other evidence; make more certain.' Thus a confession cannot corroborate itself.\ (alteration in original) (quoting The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 412 (4th ed. 2000))
- \[A] confession cannot corroborate itself.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 197×
- People v. Rolandis G.Illinois Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 154×
- McWatters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-03-18· cited 98×
- State v. SilerOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-25· cited 77×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-28· cited 75×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-22· cited 55×
- Rangel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-13· cited 53×
- State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-09-19· cited 21×
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-11-04· cited 18×
- People v. RichterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-10-22· cited 18×
- Milton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-27· cited 13×
- State v. TsosieNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2022-07-14· cited 13×
- State v. HobbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-18· cited 11×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-06-05· cited 7×
- Duhs v. CapraE.D. New York· 2015-02-03· cited 6×
- Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-23· cited 5×
- Petit v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-25· cited 4×
- State v. TumlinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-18· cited 2×
- Rangel, RodolfoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-13
- In re Rolandis G.Illinois Supreme Court· 2008-11-20
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-01-18· cited 566×
- State v. StahlOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-08· cited 189×
- United States v. Edward E. Bordeaux, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 2005-03-07· cited 149×
- State v. VaughtNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-07-09· cited 138×
- People v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-01-23· cited 133×
- State v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-02-07· cited 113×
- Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-20· cited 102×
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-10-17· cited 92×
- State v. JustusSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-11-21· cited 86×
- People v. SisavathCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-05-27· cited 84×
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 70×
- People v. GenoMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-04-27· cited 67×
- People v. T.T.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-08-20· cited 64×
- Rangel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-07-25· cited 57×
- State v. MacKOregon Supreme Court· 2004-11-26· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. DeOliveiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-06-19· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.