Skip to main content

State v. Russell

Citations

  • 503 N.W.2d 110
  • 1993 Minn. LEXIS 457
  • 1993 WL 261718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding robbery and murder of victim “were parts of a single, continuous transaction or chain of events because the activities occurred within a short period of time, at the same location, and as part of the act of robbing [the victim]”
  • “Even if the underlying felony is complete before the homicide occurs, felony murder may still be applicable.”
  • “In making its factual determination, the jury was entitled to make reasonable inferences from the evidence, including inferences based on their experiences or common sense.” (quotation omitted)
  • “In making its factual determination, the [fact-finder] was entitled to make reasonable inferences from the evidence, including inferences based on their experiences or common sense.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.