Skip to main content

State v. S.S.

Citations

  • 229 N.J. 360
  • 162 A.3d 1058
  • 2017 WL 2665134
  • 2017 N.J. LEXIS 682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appellate court is simply not as experienced nor as capable as the trial court at making credibility assessments or factual findings
  • concluding that a trial court's fact-finding based solely on a video recording is disturbed only \when factual findings are so clearly mistaken-so wide of the mark-that the interests of justice demand intervention\
  • instructing that appellate courts should not rely on video footage to overturn facts determined in the trial court unless the footage \clearly\ contradicts those A-3600-22 5 findings
  • holding that \[w]hen more than one reasonable inference can be drawn from the review of\ documentary evidence, \then the one accepted by a trial court cannot be unreasonable\ and \the mere substitution of an appellate court's judgment for that of the trial court's advances no greater good.\
  • holding \that a standard of deference to a trial court's factfindings . . . best advances the interests of justice in a judicial system that assigns different roles to trial courts and appellate courts\
  • holding \that a standard of deference to a trial court's factfindings . . . best advances the interests of justice in a judicial system that assigns different roles to trial courts and appellate courts\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Albin, Fernandez, Lavecchia, Patterson, Rabner, Solomon, Timpone, Vina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. S.S.

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.