Skip to main content

State v. Knight

Citations

  • 678 A.2d 642
  • 145 N.J. 233
  • 1996 N.J. LEXIS 946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a ruling finding a state constitutional right to counsel did not apply retroactively “to those defendants who had exhausted all avenues of direct relief at the time [State v.] Sanchez [129 N.J. 261, 609 A.2d 400 (1992) ] was decided”
  • noting that a new rule is generally not provided retroactivity \when such an application would undermine the validity of large numbers of convictions\ and \overwhelm[] courts\
  • estimating retroactivity would affect “an immense number of cases -- far too many to tally”
  • enumerating the alternatives available which are purely prospective, prospective, pipeline retroactive, and fully retroactive
  • enumerating the alternatives available which are purely prospective, prospective, pipeline retroactive, and fully retroactive
  • enumerating the alternatives available which are purely prospective, prospective, pipeline retroactive, and fully retroactive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.