Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/26/1993

State v. Hamilton

Citations

868 P.2d 986
177 Ariz. 403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

135 years flat time for three acts of molestation and three acts of sexual conduct by live-in boyfriend against his girlfriend's 14-year-old daughter
“A party must make a specific and timely objection at trial to the admission of certain evidence in order to preserve the issue for appeal.”
“[I]n order to prevail on an arguably duplicitous indictment, defendant must demonstrate that he was actually prejudiced thereby.”
“In the context of criminal law, an offender must be punished under the law in force when the offense was committed and is not exempted from punishment by a subsequent amendment to the applicable statutory provision.”
psychological evidence of child abuse accommoda tion syndrome
assertion that defendant was unable to present alibi defense, “because he could not reconstruct his life for a specific year, is a theoretical, not an actual, prejudice that could be asserted any time an offense was alleged to have occurred over a period of time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Gerber, Toci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.