Arizona Supreme Court· 1/12/1989

State v. Whitney

Citations

768 P.2d 638
159 Ariz. 476
26 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
1989 Ariz. LEXIS 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a defendant was not denied an “essential right to his defense” when his defense was a denial that the alleged acts had occurred
noting that if a record indicates the minute entry contains a clerical error, remand is unnecessary
stating that there is sufficient proof of a prior felony conviction for sentencing purposes if a “defendant admits the prior conviction[] during his testimony at trial”
finding no prejudice because defendant's only defense was that the offenses did not occur and the victims fabricated their stories
finding no error when State’s allegation of the dangerous nature of the offense was untimely but defendant had notice based on the nature of the crime alleged
defendant not denied “essential right to his defense” when defense was denial that offenses had occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Gordon, Feldman, Moeller, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.