Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/24/1996

State v. Scott

Citations

930 P.2d 551
187 Ariz. 474
232 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 30
1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding there is \no Anders-hybrid type of brief\ and declining to \search the record for appealable issues\ when the defendant submitted a brief arguing issues on the merits
“Even if a trial record is incomplete, we must assume that it supports the judgment unless there is ‘at least a credible and unmet allegation of reversible error.’”
“When counsel has filed an advocate’s brief on behalf of a defendant, it is neither the role nor the duty of this court to search the record for appealable issues; that is the responsibility of defendant’s attorney.”
“When counsel has filed an advocate’s brief on behalf of a defendant, it is neither the role nor the duty of this court to search the record [to verify facts]; that is the responsibility of defendant’s attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberg, Garbarino, Toci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.