Arizona Supreme Court· 6/26/1986

State v. Lindsey

Citations

720 P.2d 73
149 Ariz. 472
1986 Ariz. LEXIS 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an objection raised in a motion to suppress evidence preserves the issue for appeal despite the lack of further objection at trial
holding that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing an expert to testify regarding the percentage of incest victims who lie
holding that reversal meant convictions were not prior convictions for purposes of harsher sentence
holding that reversal meant convictions were not prior convictions for purposes of harsher sentence
noting that we generally do “not permit expert testimony on how the jury should decide the case”
noting that we generally do \not permit expert testimony on how the jury should decide the case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.