Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/22/2008

State v. Lopez

Citations

175 P.3d 682
217 Ariz. 433
522 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 12
2008 Ariz. App. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that admission of 5 STATE v. ADKINS Decision of the Court inadmissible hearsay harmless when cumulative with defendant’s own testimony
finding that an objection on one ground does not preserve the issue on another ground and, as a result, we only review for fundamental error
concluding statements to medical professionals in post-sexual assault examination admissible under Rule 803(4)
noting that arguments not raised in opening brief generally are waived
explaining to preserve an issue for appeal, a party must make a timely objection, stating the specific ground of the objection to give the court an opportunity to correct any error
objection on one ground does not preserve objection on another ground; appellate court then reviews other ground for fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Pelander, Brammer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.