Skip to main content
· 9/9/1997

Baker v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR MARICOPA CTY.

Citations

  • 947 P.2d 910
  • 190 Ariz. 336
  • 251 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 28
  • 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Proposition 200 not applicable to defendants who committed specified offenses before Act’s effective date but were convicted thereafter
  • Proposition 200 not applicable to defendants who committed specified offenses before Act’s effective date but were convicted thereafter
  • operative criminal law generally that in effect on date of offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sult, Fidel, Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.