· 9/9/1997
Baker v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR MARICOPA CTY.
Citations
- 947 P.2d 910
- 190 Ariz. 336
- 251 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 28
- 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Proposition 200 not applicable to defendants who committed specified offenses before Act’s effective date but were convicted thereafter
- Proposition 200 not applicable to defendants who committed specified offenses before Act’s effective date but were convicted thereafter
- operative criminal law generally that in effect on date of offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sult, Fidel, Patterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.