State v. PAREDES-SOLANO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to consider challenge to superior court’s reasonable doubt instruction because the instruction was approved by the supreme court
• vacating and remanding because different dates of the acts and separate defenses rendered the basis for the jury verdict unclear
• reasoning those statutory subsections that “address [ ] two separate harms” convey “a legislative intention to create two separate offenses”
• stating substantial evidence that the defendant committed each of the actions “is not the test”
• distinguishing unitary offense of theft from subsections of assault statute, which define different crimes
• distinguishing unitary offenses from the subsections of the assault statute, which define different crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).