Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that appellate courts will not reverse “discretionary factual findings unless the record clearly establishes that the trial court was incorrect”
• holding that findings not adequately supported by the record are clearly erroneous
• noting that ability to address exhibit at trial undermines generic assertion of prejudice from insufficient disclosure
• explaining that a tidal court abuses its discretion when it commits an eri’or of law in the pi’ocess of exercising its disci’etion
• reviewing cases and finding misconduct “almost invariably ... has been combined with other, serious error, the cumulative effect of which is to compel the conclusion that there was prejudice”
• stating a court’s discretionary decision is considered abusive if “manifestly 4 GATEWAY v. MILLENNIUM Decision of the Court unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).