State v. Leyvas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
• when party “opens the door” to otherwise objectionable testimony there is no error as long as response is “pertinent” and “responsive to the invitation”
• when party “opens the door” to otherwise objectionable testimony there is no error as long as response is “pertinent” and “responsive to the invitation”
• fairness and reliability of challenged identification reviewed for clear abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).