Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/17/2003

State v. Green

Citations

826 A.2d 486
375 Md. 595
2003 Md. LEXIS 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

analyzing whether driver’s express consent to search his car expired before the start of the search
“when a police officer has probable cause to believe that a driver has broken a traffic law, the officer may detain the driver temporarily”
“That [law enforcement] called for back-up as a safety measure did not suddenly transform the consensual encounter into a seizure.”
“Where an individual’s encounter with the police is purely consensual, ‘no privacy interests [are] invaded and thus the Fourth Amendment is not implicated.’’
“Where an individual’s encounter with the police is purely consensual, ‘no privacy interests [are] invaded and thus the Fourth Amendment is not implicated.’ ”
“In the case sub judiee, like in Ferris, the parties do not dispute that Deputy Meil stopped Green because he had probable cause to believe he had violated the law by exceeding the posted speed limit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.