Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/13/2004
Laney v. State
Citations
- 842 A.2d 773
- 379 Md. 522
- 2004 Md. LEXIS 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the right to possession is a prerequisite for ejectment action
- “The right of peaceable self-help, therefore, is a viable mechanism for a title owner of property to obtain actual possession of real property from a holdover mortgagor.”
- “We make our own constitutional appraisal as to whether an action taken was proper, by reviewing the law and applying it to the facts of the case.”
- mortgagor of a home that had been foreclosed upon
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Eldridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-08· cited 157×
- Bost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 65×
- State v. NievesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-15· cited 60×
- Byndloss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-03-08· cited 42×
- Whiting v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-08· cited 36×
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-22· cited 36×
- McFarlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-17· cited 29×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-12· cited 29×
- Nickens v. Mount Vernon Realty Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-10-19· cited 27×
- Haley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-21· cited 26×
- Empire Properties, LLC v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-05-10· cited 16×
- McCain v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 16×
- Whiting v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-23· cited 15×
- Uthus v. Valley Mill CampCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-03-04· cited 15×
- Raynor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-29· cited 15×
- Alston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-05· cited 14×
- State v. SavageCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-08· cited 11×
- Griner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-25· cited 9×
- McGurk v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-07· cited 9×
- State v. RushCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-27· cited 9×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court· 1999-02-23· cited 1,221×
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 1,059×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 891×
- Murdaugh v. LivingstonSupreme Court· 1998-11-18· cited 766×
- United States v. BrazelEleventh Circuit· 1997-01-06· cited 228×
- Willis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-10-07· cited 168×
- United States v. Russell B. AllenSixth Circuit· 1997-02-10· cited 164×
- United States v. Riad Youssef RahmeSecond Circuit· 1987-03-05· cited 115×
- United States v. Merle Ellis OwensTenth Circuit· 1986-01-22· cited 110×
- State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-04-14· cited 81×
- United States v. Leamon Lee CroftTenth Circuit· 1970-09-01· cited 79×
- Dashiell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-04-10· cited 71×
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-17· cited 64×
- United States v. Chester A. ParizoSecond Circuit· 1975-03-31· cited 62×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.