Longshore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[a] person has a constitutional right to refuse to consent to a warrantless search of his or her automobile, and such refusal may not later be used to implicate guilt.”
• explaining that when police stopped defendant on suspicion of drug possession, they had no “reason to believe that [he] was armed and dangerous”
• stating that \[a]n unfair and impermissible burden would be placed upon the assertion of a constitutional right if the State could use a refusal [to consent] to a warrantless search against an individual\
• handcuffing suspect converted temporary detention on suspicion of drug possession into de facto arrest as defendant \was neither a flight nor safety risk\
• holding the refusal to consent to a warrantless search was inadmissible
• holding the refusal to consent to a warrantless search was inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).