E. SIFRIT v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and holding, “[biased on our analysis of the relevant ease law, ... that a due process violation will only be found when the demonstrated inconsistency exists at the core of the State’s case”
• “It is appropriate to consider fair play and equity when reviewing an agreement between the State and a criminal suspect....”
• “[t]he ultimate burden of proving that evidence seized without a warrant should not be suppressed falls on the State” (quoting State v. Green, 375 Md. 595, 826 A.2d 486 (2003))
• \[t]he ultimate burden of proving that evidence seized without a warrant should not be suppressed falls on the State\ (quoting State v. Green, 375 Md. 595, 826 A.2d 486 (2003))
• “The theme requiring an inconsistency at the core of the State’s case before finding a due process violation runs throughout the majority of cases that have addressed the issue.”
• “The theme requiring an inconsistency at the core of the state’s case before finding a due process violation runs throughout the majority of cases that have addressed the issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).