United States v. Miguel Sandoval

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that although knowledge of a person's criminal history is, in itself, insufficient to justify a seizure, in combination with other factors, it can constitute reasonable suspicion of current criminal activity
• recognizing that although knowledge of a person’s criminal history is, in itself, insufficient to justify a seizure, in combination with other factors, it can constitute reasonable suspicion of current criminal activity
• holding that this court can affirm the district court on any grounds, “even grounds not relied upon by the district court”
• holding that prolonged detention beyond time necessary to write citation was unreasonable absent reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
• holding that prolonged detention beyond time necessary to write citation was unreasonable absent reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
• holding that this court may affirm a district court decision on any ground supported by record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).