Oregon Supreme Court· 9/14/2000

State v. Barrett

Citations

10 P.3d 901
331 Or. 27
2000 Ore. LEXIS 696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that aggravating factors are part of a single statutory provision under aggravated murder statute, ORS 163.095
holding that aggravating factors embodied in aggravated murder statute were “alternative theories” of committing single crime of aggravated murder
holding that aggravating factors embodied in aggravated murder statute were \alternative theories\ of committing single crime of aggravated murder
holding that “appropriate procedure would have been to enter one judgment of conviction reflecting the defendant’s guilt on the charge of aggravated murder, which judgment separately would enumerate each of the existing aggravating factors”
holding that, in those circumstances, the trial court should have “enter [ed] one judgment of conviction reflecting the defendant’s guilt on the charge of aggravated murder, which judgment separately would enumerate each of the existing aggravating factors”
reasoning that “[t]he aggravating factors [in ORS 163.095] constitute no more than different theories under which murder becomes subject to the enhanced penalties for aggravated murder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Leeson, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.