Oregon Supreme Court· 7/29/2010

State v. Willis

Citations

236 P.3d 714
348 Or. 566
2010 Ore. LEXIS 557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding on direct appeal that admit- ting a crime lab report without supporting testimony from the police criminalist who wrote it violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses
holding on direct appeal that admit- ting a crime lab report without supporting testimony from the police criminalist who wrote it violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses
holding on direct appeal that admit- ting a crime lab report without supporting testimony from the police criminalist who wrote it violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses
emphasizing that erroneously admitted evidence “went to “the heart of * * * the case” (quoting State v. Davis, 336 Or 19, 34, 77 P3d 1111 (2003)). Other factors this court considers include whether erroneously admitted (or erroneously excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.