State v. Hayes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that impeachment by contradiction requires a precise fact statement to which the rebuttal evidence is contradictory because, “ [i] f a statement is ambiguous or imprecise, there is a danger that the evidence will seem to contradict something that was not intended”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gibson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-06-03· cited 67×
• State v. Rood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-03· cited 15×
• State v. Guritz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-10· cited 13×
• State v. Stapp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-29· cited 8×
• State v. Cuffy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-11-16· cited 6×
• State v. Peoples
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-03-05· cited 1×