Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 357 Or. 1
  • 346 P.3d 455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that OEC 404(4) supersedes OEC 404(3) in criminal cases except to the extent required by the state and federal constitutions
  • ruling that evidence that the defendant possessed a child’s underwear was admissible to demonstrate his sexual inter- est in children
  • holding that “OEC 404(4) makes ‘other acts’ evidence admissible if it is relevant under OEC 401 and admissible under OEC 403”
  • recognizing that the categorical bar on character evidence in OEC 404(3) “is no longer the rule” in criminal cases
  • recognizing that the categorical bar on character evidence in OEC 404(3) “is no longer the rule” in criminal cases
  • recognizing that the categorical bar on character evidence in OEC 404(3) “is no longer the rule” in criminal cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.