Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/3/1993

State v. Rood

Citations

848 P.2d 128
118 Or. App. 480
1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding the trial court did not err in admitting two x-rated videos where the victims testified they had been shown pornography by defendant and, therefore, the videos “corroborated [the victims’] description of the circumstances and events surrounding the crimes”
evidence that the defendant had purchased x-rated videos was admissible to corroborate complainants’ accounts that the defendant had watched x-rated videos while sexually abusing them
evidence that the defendant had purchased x-rated videos was admissible to corroborate complainants' accounts that the defendant had watched x-rated videos while sexually abusing them
evidence that the defendant had purchased X-rated videos was admissible to corroborate complainants’ accounts that the defendant had watched X-rated videos while sexually abusing them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rossman, De Muniz Leeson, Leeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.