Skip to main content

State v. Fitzgerald

Citations

  • 257 Conn. 106
  • 777 A.2d 580
  • 2001 Conn. LEXIS 308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that record revealed no evidence of bias and defendant’s failure to object after improper disclosure of part B information was “tantamount to consent to the judge’s participation in the case”
  • judge informed of part B information in open court in violation of Practice Book § 37-11
  • prosecutor’s improper disclosure of part B information to judge prior to trial did not require reversal of conviction under plain error doctrine because any error resulting from prosecutor’s disclosure could have been remedied by request that judge recuse himself
  • prosecutor’s improper disclosure of part B informat ion to judge prior to trial did not require reversal of conviction under plain error doctrine because any error resulting from prosecutor’s disclosure could have been remedied by request that judge recuse himself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norcott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.