Alliance Partners, Inc. v. Voltarc Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[t]he rules of practice vest broad authority in the Appellate Court for the management of its docket\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• Appellate Court has broad authority to manage docket, including discretion to decline review of untimely claims
• ‘‘[w]e cannot conclude on the facts of this case that the Appellate Court abused its discretion in determining that the plaintiff’s explana- tion for its late appeal did not constitute good cause’’
• Appellate Court has discretion to determine whether party has established good cause to file late appeal under Practice Book (2003) § 60-2 (6) (now § 60- 2 (5)); Ramos v. Commissioner of Correction, 248 Conn. 52, 59, 61, 727 A.2d 213 (1999

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Alliance Partners, Inc. v. Voltarc Technologies, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Alliance Partners, Inc. v. Voltarc Technologies, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-01-17· cited 1×