Skip to main content

State v. Pierce

Citations

  • 269 Conn. 442
  • 849 A.2d 375
  • 2004 Conn. LEXIS 213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that party’s conduct represented acquiescence to court’s rulings and constituted waiver of claim on appeal
  • holding that Appellate Court improperly invoked plain error to raise supple- mentary issues when ‘‘trial court acted pursuant to a presumptively valid statute in accordance with its express provisions’’
  • standard of review of Appellate Court’s invocation of plain error doctrine is abuse of discretion
  • reversed and remanded with direction to reinstate sexual offender registry requirement imposed by trial court
  • \the plain error doctrine should not be applied in order to review a ruling that is not arguably incorrect in the first place\
  • ‘‘the plain error doctrine should not be applied in order to review a ruling that is not arguably incorrect in the first place’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.