Supreme Court of Connecticut· 11/13/1984

State v. Fullwood

Citations

194 Conn. 573
484 A.2d 435
1984 Conn. LEXIS 711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing risks, but concluding that record was inadequate for review of defendant’s plea bargaining claims
\The defendant has equally failed to substantiate his related allegation that the trial judge's rulings on various pretrial and trial motions demonstrate actual bias. Adverse rulings do not themselves constitute evidence of bias.\
defendant could not prevail on claim trial judge improperly denied defendant’s motion requesting recusal pursuant to canon 3 [c] where judge participated in pretrial plea negotiations because defendant failed to provide record revealing contents of allegedly prejudicial negotiations
“ [a]dverse rulings do not themselves constitute evidence of bias”
alleged participation in pretrial negotiations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Fullwood

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.