Skip to main content

State v. Bunker

Citations

  • 89 Conn. App. 605
  • 874 A.2d 301
  • 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • offer of proof should contain specific evidence rather than vague assertions and sheer speculation
  • although evidence of coercion would have been relevant and helpful to establishing defense of entrapment, defendant’s offer of proof included only vague assertions about “possible coercion” and “possible threats” that may have been revealed by informant’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schaller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.