Connecticut Appellate Court· 8/29/1995
State v. Bradley
Citations
- 39 Conn. App. 82
- 663 A.2d 1100
- 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 389
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[a] conviction [under § 53a-134 (a) (4)] can result whether [or not] the defendant possessed a gun”
- possession of operable firearm “is a necessary element of robbery pursuant to § 53a-134 [a] [2]”
- “we note that the defendant incorrectly assumes that operability of a weapon is an element of the crime of carrying apistol without apermit”
- whether gun that was operable when recovered by police had been operable during commission of crime was question of fact for jury, to be resolved by direct and circumstantial evidence
- police successfully test fired gun abandoned by defendant four days earlier
- ‘‘[m]otions for continuance on the eve of trial are disfavored’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hyllen-Davey v. Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-05-09· cited 38×
- State v. StevensonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-06-01· cited 30×
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-07-06· cited 29×
- State v. BanksConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-01· cited 24×
- State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-27· cited 24×
- State v. CalderonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-04-06· cited 24×
- State v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-31· cited 22×
- State v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-09-22· cited 20×
- State v. DuncanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-07-18· cited 18×
- State v. WegmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-04· cited 14×
- Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.D. Connecticut· 2000-11-03· cited 12×
- State v. TinsleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-17· cited 12×
- State v. BreckenridgeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-10-23· cited 12×
- State v. Daniel G.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-01-21· cited 10×
- State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-09· cited 8×
- State v. GebeauConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-11-23· cited 4×
- State v. SladeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-12· cited 3×
- Hudson City Savings Bank v. HellmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-07-29· cited 3×
- Dissent - State v. Daniel G.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-01-21
- State v. JarmonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-01-14
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-09-07· cited 172×
- Velasquez-Mercado v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 122×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 108×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 102×
- State v. DelossantosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-23· cited 101×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-11· cited 100×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-13· cited 86×
- Sekou v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-25· cited 73×
- State v. MejiaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-23· cited 69×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 59×
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-02-11· cited 56×
- In Re MongilloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-07-19· cited 40×
- State v. HopesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-01-14· cited 34×
- State v. PattersonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-22· cited 31×
- Steadman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-05-20· cited 30×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-21· cited 23×
- State v. ScalesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-06-20· cited 14×
- State v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-04-25· cited 12×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-14· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.